Redirect


This site has moved to http://economistsview.typepad.com/
The posts below are backup copies from the new site.

July 9, 2015

Latest Posts from Economist's View

Latest Posts from Economist's View


Fed Watch: Mediocre Tranquility

Posted: 09 Jul 2015 12:15 AM PDT

Tim Duy:

Mediocre Tranquility, by Tim Duy: The US economy is an island of mediocre tranquility in the midst of the stormy sea of the global economy. Tranquil enough to keep the Fed eyeing its first rate hike despite the surrounding storm, but sufficiently mediocre that they feel no reason to rush into that hike. As such, the Fed will remain on the sidelines until the forecast points toward sunnier skies. Uncertainty from Greece and China are likely raising the bar on the domestic conditions that would justify a rate hike.
Monetary policymakers are increasingly convinced that the first quarter weakness in US data was largely an aberration. From the minutes of the June FOMC meeting:
In discussing how to interpret the reported weakness in real GDP during the first quarter, participants considered alternative estimates of real economic activity based on various data-filtering models maintained by Board and Reserve Bank staff. These models yielded a range of estimates, but, overall, they suggested that real activity in the first quarter was likely stronger than the then-current official estimate of real GDP. Some participants indicated that the higher alternative estimates seemed more consistent with the increases in real gross domestic income and private domestic final purchases in the first quarter as well as the strength in employment and hours worked.
Effectively, policymakers believe the first quarter dissapointment was largely noise; the underlying pace of growth remained fairly consistent with recent trends. Moreover, data since the June meeting suggests the Fed's confidence is warranted. Via the Atlanta Federal Reserve:

Gdpnow-forecast-evolution-2

And while they believe risks to the economy are fairly balanced:
While participants generally saw the risks to their projections of economic activity and the labor market as balanced,...
they aren't all that comfortable with the outlook:
...they gave a number of reasons to be cautious in assessing the outlook.
One group is concerned with the still too slow progress toward their goals:
Some pointed to the risk that the weaker-than-anticipated rise in economic activity over the first half of the year could reflect factors that might continue to restrain sales and production, and that economic activity might not have sufficient momentum to sustain progress toward the Committee's objectives. In particular, they were concerned that consumers could remain cautious or that the drag on sectors affected by lower energy prices and the higher dollar could persist.
Another thought growth would come roaring back:
Others, however, viewed the strength in the labor market in recent months as potentially signaling a stronger-than-expected bounceback in economic activity.
I suspect the last labor report - with its ho-hum headline NFP number and downward revisions to previous months - took some of the steam out of that argument. Some were looking abroad for problems:
Several mentioned their uncertainty about whether Greece and its official creditors would reach an agreement and about the likely pace of economic growth abroad, particularly in China and other emerging market economies.
And who knows what is going on with productivity? From the minutes:
Other concerns were related to whether the apparent weakness in productivity growth recently would be reversed or continue. On the one hand, a rebound in productivity growth in coming quarters might restrain hiring and slow the improvement in labor market conditions. On the other hand, if productivity growth remained weak, the labor market might tighten more quickly and inflation might rise more rapidly than anticipated.
And on and on it goes. Consumer spending has good fundamentals, but seems too weak relative to expectations. Housing markets are looking up, but remain historically soft and plagued by problems such as tight underwriting. Manufacturing is soft, but autos are strong and so too is the service sector. Labor markets are making progress toward goals, but slack remains.
On labor markets, however, there does seem to be a growing conviction that we are coming close to full employment:
...Several other participants indicated that, in their view, labor market slack had already been largely eliminated.
The ongoing rise in labor demand appeared to have begun to result in a firming of wage increases. Recent readings on the employment cost index, hourly compensation, and average hourly earnings of employees suggested some acceleration in wages. According to business contacts in a number of Districts, many firms looking for new workers said they had been raising wages selectively to attract them; some had also begun to raise wages more generally...
But even this bright spot is not so bright:
...However, several participants pointed out that, even with the recent upturn, wage increases remain subdued...
Inflation remained low, but some participants offered evidence of better numbers in the future:
Participants discussed how the incoming information regarding inflation influenced their expectations for reaching the FOMC's 2 percent inflation objective over the medium term. Total PCE inflation continued to run below the Committee's objective. However, participants noted that the apparent stabilization of crude oil prices and the foreign exchange value of the dollar would reduce the downward pressure on inflation from falling prices of energy and imported goods. Core PCE price inflation, as measured on a 12-month change basis, had slowed slightly from an already low rate. However, several participants pointed out that the 3-month change in that index had firmed recently, signaling some improvement in the inflation outlook. In addition, some cited alternative measures of inflation, such as the trimmed mean and median consumer price indexes (CPIs) and the trimmed mean PCE, which continued to run at higher levels than overall PCE inflation.
The upshot for policy:
Most participants judged that the conditions for policy firming had not yet been achieved; a number of them cautioned against a premature decision. Many participants emphasized that, in order to determine that the criteria for beginning policy normalization had been met, they would need additional information indicating that economic growth was strengthening, that labor market conditions were continuing to improve, and that inflation was moving back toward the Committee's objective.
In short, the US economy is locked into the most mediocre of equilibriums. Consistent if uninspiring growth:

GDP070815

job growth sufficient to gradually eliminate labor market slack:

NFP070815

but not fast enough to rapidly raise wages

Phillips070815

or push inflation back to or beyond target:

PCE070815

Nothing to panic about, nothing to write home about. The general improvement and proximity to full-employment points toward a rate hike this year so that policy is leading any incipient inflationary pressures, but they need see more progress to pull the trigger. This point was reiterated by San Francisco Federal Reserve President John Williams Tuesday:
...I still expect inflation to move back up to our target over the next couple of years. With a strengthening economy, special factors dissipating, wages on the rise, inflation expectations stable at 2 percent, and, importantly, full employment right around the corner, I see all the factors in place to meet our inflation goal by the end of next year. But the point of being data dependent is that information drives your decisions; and while my forecast looks great, I am wary of acting before gathering more evidence that inflation's trajectory is on the desired path...
...policy is data dependent. And the difficulty of being data dependent is that data can be all over the place. Until I have more confidence that inflation will be moving back to 2 percent, I'll continue to be in wait-and-see mode...
Two other points from the Williams speech worth considering. First is that I suspect the Fed is cautious but not yet terribly worried about events abroad. I doubt Williams is much of an outlier when he says:
...I visited China recently, and I arrived fully cognizant of the concerns people highlight—slower growth, the unsustainability of the current export-driven model, debt buildup, bubbles in the equity and housing markets, the risk of falling investment, and the overall international implications of those risks. But I have to say that, after talking to officials and academics there, I was a lot less concerned about China's near-term economic outlook on my return flight than I was heading over...
...As for Greece, an ultimate decision appears to be a moveable feast. What I can say is this: Yes, there are risks, but I see them as unlikely to overturn the otherwise strong fundamentals of the U.S. economy...
...While a worst-case scenario of a Greek exit from the euro leading to sizable financial and economic impacts on the global economy cannot be ruled out, it remains an unlikely tail risk...
Second is that Williams has a fairly depressing view of potential growth:
Looking towards next year, what we really want to see is an economy that's growing at a steady pace of around 2 percent. If jobs and growth kept the same pace as last year, we would seriously overshoot our mark. I want to see continued improvement, but it's not surprising, and it's actually desirable, that the pace is slowing.
Mediocre with a capital "M."
Bottom Line: The US economy is plain vanilla. Clearly not accelerating enough to justify a faster pace of monetary policy normalization, but not slow enough for the Fed to abandon their hope of at least initiating the first rate hike this year. They are still looking for stronger numbers, however, to pull that trigger. Fed officials on average are cautiously optimistic the issues in China and Greece will not spill over to the US economy, giving them the opportunity to hike rates. Still, in the absence of confirmation of that hypothesis, those issues still decrease the odds of a rate hike this year. This is especially the case if the recent decline in commodity price places renewed downward pressure on inflation. Such an outcome would raise the bar on the strength of the remaining data to justify a rate hike. In her speech Friday, we will hopefully learn more of Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen's view on the importance of Greece and China for US monetary policy.

Links for 07-09-15

Posted: 09 Jul 2015 12:06 AM PDT

'Trading on Leaked Macroeconomic Data'

Posted: 08 Jul 2015 10:39 AM PDT

Carola Binder:

Trading on Leaked Macroeconomic Data: The official release times of U.S. macroeconomic data are big deals in financial markets. A new paper finds evidence of substantial informed trading before the official release time of certain macroeconomic variables, suggesting that information is often leaked. Alexander Kurov, Alessio Sancetta, Georg H. Strasser, and Marketa Halova Wolfe examine high-frequency stock index and Treasury futures markets data around releases of U.S. macroeconomic announcement...
They consider the 30 macroeconomic announcements that other authors have shown tend to move markets...
Why do prices start to move before release time? It could be that some traders are superior forecasters, making better use of publicly-available information, and waiting until a few minutes before the announcement to make their trades. Alternatively, information might be leaked before the official release. Kurov et al. note that, while the first possibility cannot be ruled out entirely, the leaked information explanation appears highly likely. ...
I wish I had a better sense of who was obtaining the leaked information and how much they were making from it.

'Policy Lessons From The Eurodebacle'

Posted: 08 Jul 2015 10:02 AM PDT

Paul Krugman:

Policy Lessons From The Eurodebacle: ...there's a broader lesson from Greece that is relevant to all of us — and it's not the usual one about mending our free-spending ways lest we become Greece, Greece I tell you. What we learn, instead, is that fiscal austerity plus hard money is a deeply toxic mix. The fiscal austerity depresses the economy, and pushes it toward deflation; if it's accompanied by hard money (in Greece's case the euro, but a fixed exchange rate, a gold standard, or any kind of obsessive fear of inflation would do the trick), the result is not just a depression and deflation, but quite likely a failure even to reduce the debt ratio. ...
So, how does this play into U.S. policy debates? Well, Republicans love to warn that America might turn into Greece any day now. But look at the policy mix that is now de facto GOP orthodoxy: sharp cuts in government spending (maybe offset by tax cuts for the rich, but these won't provide much stimulus), combined with a monetary policy obsessed with fears of dollar "debasement". That is, the conservative side of the US political spectrum, while holding up Greece as a cautionary tale, is actually demanding that we emulate the policy mix that turned Greek debt into a complete disaster.

'How Sensitive Is Housing Demand to Down Payment Requirements and Mortgage Rates?'

Posted: 08 Jul 2015 10:01 AM PDT

Via Liberty Street Economics, these results are what I would have expected:

How Sensitive Is Housing Demand to Down Payment Requirements and Mortgage Rates?, by Andreas Fuster and Basit Zafar: When a household is looking to buy a home, financial considerations are usually very important. In particular, in deciding "how much house to buy," a household must ponder how large a down payment it can make at the time of purchase, and also how much it can afford to pay each month. The minimum required down payment and the interest rate on available mortgages (which determines the monthly payment) are key elements in the decision. When these variables change, this likely affects the price a household is willing and able to pay for a home, and thus the housing market overall. However, measuring the strength of these effects is notoriously difficult. In this post, which is based on a recent staff report, we describe a novel approach to measure these effects. We find that a change in down payment requirements tends to have a large effect on housing demand—households' willingness to pay for a given home—especially for current renters, whereas the effects of a change in the mortgage rate are modest. ...

Taken together, our findings suggest that the strength of housing demand is strongly affected by fundamentals (household wealth and income) and also the quantity of available financing (especially for first-time home buyers). The price of available financing (that is, the mortgage rate) may play a less important role than commonly thought...

No comments: